Canon?s New $30K Camera Shoots at ISO 4,000,000

[Mugwump]

Dang..... ....some rig....



Do a quick skim of the internet camera message boards and it?s not hard to find people criticizing Canon for their lack of innovation in terms of sensor technology. People quote DXO scores in a vacuum and say that Canon isn?t innovating anymore, but with cameras like their new ME20F-SH, it?s going to be hard to keep saying that. Their new $30,000 interchangeable-lens camera is capable of pushing its ISO rating over 4,000,000.

The sensor inside is a 35mm-sized full-frame CMOS with pixels that are roughly 5.5-times the size of those found in their high-end DSLRs like the 1D X. From the press release: ?Furthermore, the sensor's pixels and readout circuitry make use of Canon proprietary technologies to achieve both reduced noise and exceptionally high sensitivity on subjects with a minimum illumination of less than 0.0005 lux.? So, basically, it can shoot in the dark. For some reference, .0001 lux would be the equivalent of a night with full cloud cover and no moonlight. So, seriously dark.

The front of the camera has a cinema locking style EF mount, so it uses their standard lenses, while the back of the camera has an array of video interfaces that allow it to be worked into a cinema system.

As stated above, the camera costs $30,000 just for the module alone and is meant for industrial applications and big-budget productions, but it will be very interesting to see if this sensor tech starts to work its way down into the pro and even consumer grade camera lines.



The current DSLR ISO war is sitting at 409,600 with cameras like Nikon?s D4s and the Sony A7s, so this would be a substantial jump. However, it remains to be seen at what point images from the Canon cross the barrier into unusably noisy.

Canon has a large expo coming up, so it seems pretty safe to assume they will be touting this thing pretty heavily and I?m looking forward to checking it out.

http://www.popphoto.com/canons-new-30k-camera-shoots-iso-4000000?src=SOC&dom=fb

[wsantia1]

I bet I couldn't take pictures with this thing either.

[Mugwump]

I bet I couldn't take pictures with this thing either.

....but the odds would be more in your favor....

[GraphicGr8s]

For that much money I'll take the 645D

[BallAquatics]

For that much money, I'd hire someone to take my photos  and then use the rest of the money to take a trip.....

http://www.dawnontheamazon.com/tropicalfishcollecting.html



Dennis

[Ron Sower]

For that much money, I'd hire someone to take my photos  and then use the rest of the money to take a trip.....

http://www.dawnontheamazon.com/tropicalfishcollecting.html



Dennis

I'm with you on that, Dennis.....!

[PaulineMi]

For that much money, I'd hire someone to take my photos  and then use the rest of the money to take a trip.....

http://www.dawnontheamazon.com/tropicalfishcollecting.html



Me too!

Dennis

I'm with you on that, Dennis.....!

[BillT]

I am guessing that this camera is for low light level work or taking images in very short time frames (depending on the shutter speed).

I used to work in labs that bought several thousand dollar cameras to put on microscopes for doing time lapses of weakly illuminated florescently labelled cells.